Back to Insights
Spotlight

OpenAI Projects & Group Chats: The Co-Creation Revolution in AI

OpenAI launched Group Chats in November 2025, enabling up to 20 people to collaborate with ChatGPT in real-time conversations—transforming AI from solo tool to team platform.

GreenData Leadership
6 min read

OpenAI Projects & Group Chats: The Co-Creation Revolution in AI

On November 14, 2025, OpenAI launched Group Chats in ChatGPT—a pilot feature enabling up to 20 people to collaborate with AI in real-time conversations. Combined with Shared Projects (expanded to all users in October 2025), OpenAI is fundamentally repositioning ChatGPT from a solo productivity tool to a collaborative platform for team intelligence.

For enterprises watching AI's evolution from individual assistants to organizational infrastructure, these features signal a critical shift: AI is becoming a participant in team dynamics, not just a tool individuals use privately.

The question isn't whether your teams will collaborate with AI. The question is how your organization will adapt workflows, governance, and culture when AI joins every group conversation.

What OpenAI Just Launched

According to OpenAI's November 14, 2025 announcement, Group Chats launched as a limited pilot in Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, and Taiwan, available to Free, Plus, Pro, and ChatGPT Go users on mobile and web platforms.

The mechanics are straightforward but transformative: Any ChatGPT user can tap the people icon in the top-right corner, generate a shareable invite link, and bring up to 20 people into a conversation where ChatGPT participates as an intelligent group member.

What makes this different from simply sharing ChatGPT outputs? According to OpenAI's technical documentation, Group Chats introduce context-aware participation. ChatGPT learns when to contribute versus when to stay silent, responding intelligently to group dynamics rather than answering every message. The AI can reference member profile photos, use emoji reactions, and adapt its communication style to group conversation flow.

How does this differ from Shared Projects? According to product documentation released in October 2025, Shared Projects function as persistent workspaces for organizing files, conversations, and instructions—asynchronous collaboration around documents and tasks. Group Chats enable synchronous real-time conversation where ChatGPT acts as a live participant in group planning, brainstorming, and decision-making.

Together, these features create complementary collaboration modes: Shared Projects for organized, file-based teamwork; Group Chats for live group intelligence.

The Use Cases Are Immediately Obvious

According to OpenAI's announcement materials, early pilot users are deploying Group Chats across predictable but powerful scenarios:

Collaborative planning: Trip coordination where ChatGPT suggests itineraries, compares accommodation options, and helps groups reach consensus on logistics. According to early user feedback, the AI's ability to synthesize multiple preferences and propose compromises accelerates group decision-making.

Work and study groups: Teams drafting proposals, researchers organizing notes, students collaborating on projects. ChatGPT serves as intelligent assistant that all group members can query simultaneously—no more one person acting as "the ChatGPT operator" while others wait.

Real-time problem-solving: Technical troubleshooting, strategic discussions, creative brainstorming where ChatGPT contributes suggestions, identifies patterns across group contributions, and helps structure thinking. According to pilot feedback, having AI actively participate transforms discussion quality—surfacing connections human participants miss.

Decision support: Restaurant selection, vendor evaluation, purchase decisions where ChatGPT can research options in real-time while the group discusses. Instead of "someone look that up," ChatGPT handles research as conversation flows.

The pattern across use cases: Group Chats eliminate the friction of "someone consult ChatGPT and report back." AI becomes a synchronous participant, accessible to everyone simultaneously.

The Technical Implementation Details Matter

According to OpenAI's technical specifications released with Group Chats:

Rate limits apply only when ChatGPT responds, not to human-to-human messages within the group. This allows organic conversation flow without hitting API restrictions during group dialogue.

Privacy is compartmentalized: Personal ChatGPT memories and private conversations remain completely separate from group chats. Group chat context doesn't leak into individual accounts. According to OpenAI's privacy documentation, group chats appear in a separate sidebar section, clearly distinguishing them from personal interactions.

Content safety activates automatically: If a minor joins a group chat, content filters activate for all members, not just the minor. This addresses compliance concerns about AI participating in groups with mixed age ranges.

Model selection: Group Chats use GPT-5.1 Auto, OpenAI's latest autonomous reasoning model announced November 11, 2025. This enables more sophisticated context awareness and decision-making about when AI should contribute versus stay silent.

Profile awareness: ChatGPT can reference member profile photos and names in responses, creating more natural group interaction. According to user reports, this significantly improves the "ChatGPT is actually in the conversation" experience.

For enterprises evaluating deployment, these technical details reveal OpenAI's attention to the governance and safety requirements group collaboration introduces.

The Broader Collaborative AI Context

OpenAI's Group Chats don't exist in isolation. They're part of accelerating movement toward collaborative AI across the industry:

Microsoft announced Copilot for Teams in October 2025, embedding AI directly into group meetings and chats. According to Microsoft's positioning, every Teams conversation can include Copilot as an active participant—summarizing discussion, suggesting next steps, capturing action items.

Google's Gemini Enterprise launched in October 2025 with "Taskforce" prebuilt agents designed for team workflows. According to Google's documentation, Taskforce agents coordinate across multiple team members' work, managing dependencies and handoffs between people.

Anthropic's Claude Code launched web access in October 2025 with collaboration features enabling multiple developers to work on the same coding project with AI assistance. According to Anthropic's announcement, Claude can "teleport" work between team members, maintaining context across handoffs.

The pattern is consistent: Major AI platforms are racing to embed AI into team workflows, not just individual productivity. The companies that figure out group AI interaction first will define how organizations use AI for the next decade.

The Enterprise Implications Are Profound

For enterprise leaders, OpenAI's collaborative AI features create both opportunities and governance challenges:

Opportunity: Amplified team intelligence. According to organizational psychology research, effective teams outperform individuals by leveraging diverse perspectives, collective knowledge, and collaborative problem-solving. Adding AI as an intelligent participant with instant access to vast knowledge and reasoning capabilities potentially amplifies team performance beyond what human-only groups achieve.

Opportunity: Reduced AI access friction. Currently, organizations where only some team members have AI tool access create bottlenecks—"AI-enabled" employees become intermediaries for colleagues without access. Group Chats democratize AI access within teams, ensuring everyone can leverage capabilities simultaneously.

Opportunity: Accelerated decision-making. According to early pilot feedback, Group Chats significantly reduce decision cycle times. Real-time access to AI research, analysis, and synthesis during group discussions eliminates the delay of "someone go research that and we'll reconvene."

Challenge: Governance complexity. If ChatGPT participates in sensitive business discussions, what data governance applies? What information can AI access? What outputs require human verification before acting on? Enterprises need policies for AI participation in team contexts, not just individual use.

Challenge: Compliance and confidentiality. Regulated industries—healthcare, finance, legal—face questions about what information can be shared in AI-inclusive group conversations. If ChatGPT participates in patient care team meetings or client strategy sessions, compliance frameworks must address AI as a participant, not just a tool.

Challenge: Quality control at scale. When individuals use ChatGPT privately, quality issues affect single users. When ChatGPT participates in team decisions, errors propagate to entire groups. Enterprises need verification processes for AI contributions in collaborative contexts.

What Shared Projects Enable

While Group Chats enable real-time collaboration, Shared Projects (expanded to all ChatGPT users in October 2025) enable asynchronous teamwork.

According to OpenAI Academy's documentation released October 2025, Shared Projects function as dedicated workspaces where teams can:

Organize context: Upload files, documents, proposals, contracts, and data that all project collaborators can reference. According to OpenAI's technical specs, Pro users can upload up to 40 files per project and invite up to 100 collaborators.

Maintain isolated memory: Projects can use project-only memory that doesn't leak into other ChatGPT conversations. This enables teams to maintain context for specific initiatives without contaminating unrelated work.

Collaborate asynchronously: Team members add chats, files, and instructions that all collaborators can access. Everyone sees updates in real-time, but work happens asynchronously as schedules permit.

Integrate with enterprise controls: Enterprise customers get additional governance capabilities—audit logs, access controls, compliance features—that make Shared Projects viable for regulated environments.

The combination of Shared Projects (asynchronous workspace) and Group Chats (synchronous conversation) creates comprehensive collaborative AI infrastructure.

The Strategic Positioning Against Microsoft

OpenAI's collaborative features directly challenge Microsoft's early lead in enterprise AI collaboration.

Microsoft Copilot is embedded directly into Office 365, Teams, Outlook, and SharePoint—giving Microsoft natural distribution advantages. Enterprises already standardized on Microsoft productivity suites get Copilot capabilities without changing platforms.

OpenAI's strategy? Make ChatGPT so compelling as a collaboration platform that organizations use it alongside Microsoft tools rather than being limited to Microsoft's AI.

According to Menlo Ventures' July 2025 enterprise AI market analysis, OpenAI's enterprise market share fell from 50% in 2023 to 25% in 2025, while Microsoft-integrated options gained ground. Collaborative features represent OpenAI's counter-strategy—building capabilities Microsoft doesn't yet offer (like Group Chats with 20 participants) and positioning ChatGPT as platform-agnostic AI that works regardless of your productivity suite.

For enterprises, this competition creates leverage. Microsoft must continue innovating Copilot capabilities to compete with ChatGPT's features. OpenAI must keep building enterprise-grade governance and integration. Competition drives better products and better pricing for buyers.

What Enterprises Should Do Now

OpenAI's collaborative AI features are in pilot (Group Chats) or recently expanded (Shared Projects), but strategic leaders should act now:

Evaluate governance requirements for collaborative AI. Your current AI policies likely address individual use. Collaborative AI requires different frameworks. What data can teams share in AI-inclusive conversations? What approvals are needed? What verification processes apply to AI recommendations that inform group decisions?

Pilot collaborative AI for appropriate use cases. Identify low-risk team workflows where AI participation creates value without exposing sensitive data. Marketing team brainstorming, internal process improvement discussions, training and education scenarios often work well for early pilots.

Monitor global rollout of Group Chats. Currently limited to four countries, OpenAI plans global expansion based on pilot feedback. Organizations in pilot regions should test now. Others should prepare governance frameworks for when broader access arrives.

Compare collaborative AI platforms. OpenAI's Group Chats and Shared Projects compete with Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini Enterprise's Taskforce agents, and Anthropic's Claude Code collaboration. Evaluate which platforms best fit your existing technology stack, governance requirements, and team workflows.

Train teams on effective AI collaboration. Adding AI to group dynamics requires new skills. When should groups consult AI? How do you verify AI contributions? How do you prevent AI responses from anchoring group thinking too early? These aren't technology questions—they're organizational capability questions.

The Bottom Line

OpenAI's Group Chats pilot launched November 14, 2025, combined with Shared Projects expanded in October 2025, repositions ChatGPT from individual productivity tool to team collaboration platform. AI is becoming a participant in group workflows, not just something individuals use privately.

For enterprises, this shift creates immense opportunity and governance complexity. The organizations that figure out how to responsibly leverage AI in team contexts—with appropriate guardrails, verification processes, and governance frameworks—will capture value unavailable to competitors still treating AI as solo tools.

The question isn't whether AI will participate in your team workflows. OpenAI, Microsoft, Google, and Anthropic are all building toward that future simultaneously. The question is whether your organization will develop the policies, processes, and capabilities to leverage collaborative AI effectively—or find yourselves reacting to technology your teams are already using without guidance.

Ready to develop a collaborative AI strategy for your organization? Let's assess which team workflows benefit most from AI participation, design governance frameworks that enable safe adoption, pilot collaborative AI in controlled environments, and build organizational capabilities for the inevitable future where AI joins every important conversation. The collaboration revolution is here—the question is whether you'll lead it or follow.

Ready to Apply These Insights?

Let's discuss how these strategies and frameworks can be tailored to your organization's specific challenges and opportunities.